Causes of the English Civil War Essay Example for Free

Causes of the English accomplished War actCharles I came to the throne in 1625 later on the death of his beget, James I. His reign maintained close to similarities with his fathers reign. For instance, both Charles and James had very little property and both of them believed firmly in the forebode business of Kingship1. During his reign, many events took place which led to the English accomplished War in 1642 and which ended up with the public achievement of Charles I. This essay will discuss and deal with the different factors that gave rise to the English Civil War. As was said above, one of the main problems of Charles reign was the lack of silver and, undoubtedly, this was a good basis for a civil war. Everything started when the fantan asked Charles to go to war with the Catholics in Spain.Charles did not have the needed money to face this war and so he asked for taxes, the taxes were not enough and the war was impossible. This outraged the MPs however they kne w that Charles would then c every last(predicate) them back for help. Parliament did not like Charles because they thought he spent money only on his favourites so the King himself would have to find a itinerary to make money. Charles move several things such as enforcing taxes known as ship money2, selling monopolies and titles he similarly created a Court of Star Chamber which was composed by1 The divine origin of kingship check to this doctrine, since only God can judge an un salutary king, the king can do no wrong. (Definition provided by http//www.princeton.edu/achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Divine_Right_of_Kings.html) 2 Nonparliamentary tax first levied in medieval times by the English crown on coastal cities and counties for naval defense in time of war. (Definition provided by http//www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/540944/ship-money) officials of the crown and which main take aim was to fine people heavily so as to raise money.As there was not a jury, this court would obv iously fulfill his expectations. Parliament was really angry for the illegal situation, so Charles decided to unblock it. The reign continued for eleven years without a Parliament. He called a Parliament again just because he needed money. The Covenanters expressed their desire to invade England and Charles did not have the sufficient money to strife them.The Parliament refused to give him money from the taxes and Charles dissolved it again. Eventually, as he was forced to pay a mulish sum of money to the Scots, he called a Parliament again. He was destroyed economically. Undoubtedly, Charles poor economic sell and his bad decisions were closely related to the outbreak of the civil war. An separate crucial cause was religion. These quarrels began when Charles married to Henrietta mare who was a French Catholic. Having a Catholic as a Queen was not accepted at all by English people, especially by the Puritans.Things went worse when the King made William tickle pink the Archbish op of Canterbury in 1633. The Archbishop modified many things in the Church. For instance, beatifying the Church and bringing back robes for priests, statues and stained-glass windows. Laud also attempted to chaffer the English Prayer discussion3 in Scotland. As Scotland was a Puritan (Presbytarian) country, they rioted against this Too Catholic Prayer Book and a group of Scots, the Covenanters, decided to invade England as it was mentioned in the previous paragraph. After putting Laud on trial, the Parliament found him guilty.3 A book which stated how services should be kick the bucket (Definition provided by http//www.bbc.co.uk/dna/place-london/A622937) Another major cause which led to the civil war was Charles personality. It may have the appearance _or_ semblance not a fundamental cause comparing it with the above mentioned ones. Nonetheless, his way of thinking, his bad decisions, his conflicts with the MPs, his wifes influence and his contradictory and inconsistent reign a lso contributed to the outbreak of the civil war.During Charles reign, a distinction betwixt a Short Parliament and a Long Parliament can be made. The Short Parliament was called in 1640 by the King because the Scots rebelled and due to his bad financial situation, he needed to impose a tax to deal with them (only with the Parliaments consent could he do it). This parliament was summoned after eleven years of dissolution. Even though such dissolution was not constitutional, it was one of the Kings prerogatives. The MPs met the gentry and expressed their feeling of indignation to them.Harbottle Grimston and John Pym led a catalogue of complaints. On May 5th in the same year, Charles dissolved the Parliament again blaming the malicious cunning of some few seditious affected men. Finally, Charles came to an agreement with the Scots of paying them 850 a day. On the other hand, the Long Parliament was summoned from November 3rd 1640 for thirteen years. Charles needed funds for the dai ly payment and for a last(a) settlement with the Scots. In this Parliament, 493MPs were elected most of them were from the County Faction4. Parliament sent both Strafford and Laud to the Tower incriminate them of bad influence on the King.Charles tried to calm things down signing Straffords death warrant, notch a bill that allowed for Parliament not to be dissolved without its own consent, a bill do ship money illegal and other bills that taken together demolished the framework of prerogative g overnment. 4 MPs who tried to represent the views of the landowners. (Definition provided by http//www.bbc.co.uk/dna/place-london/A622937) The Irish rebelled in 1641 because of their Kings death. Definitely, the execution of Strafford had not been a good choice. John Pym issued the Militia Bill and the Grand Remonstrance5 .Subsequently, Charles decided to arrest him and his ringleaders, he tried to arrest five MPs but as they had been previously warned, Charles could not find them. As thi s was considered a breach of Parliamentary privileges by MPs, it just made things worse between them. And it was on twenty-second August when the civil war started. To conclude, it cannot be stated that the most important cause of the English Civil War was unfair taxation because, as was described, there were many factors which created a tense relationship between Parliament and the King. Unfair taxation was a really important cause. However, it was not the only possible factor. Religious, financial and management issues played an important role as well.People who surrounded the King also took an meaty part in this big conflict. It also has to be recognized that when Charles came to the throne, things were not in good conditions. neither his father nor Charles could manage their reigns properly. A civil war could not have been avoided unless Charles would have changed his mind and way of thinking but as he was born with a belief in the Divine Origin of Kingship and did not have muc h knowledge about kingships, it would have been very difficult to achieve. 5 It listed all the things Charles had done wrong in his reign, suggested less power for bishops, and said that Parliament should have power over the Church and the appointment of Royal ministers. (Definition provided by http//www.bbc.co.uk/dna/place-london/A622937)